When it comes to choosing a bike frame, one of the most important considerations is the material it is made of. This guide outlines the pros and cons of carbon vs aluminum bike frames to help you choose which material is better for your next bike. We’ll compare the weight, durability, handling, efficiency, comfort, cost, looks, longevity, and more. This guide covers both mountain bikes and road bikes. I’ve ridden both frame materials extensively over the years. In this guide, I’ll share my experience.
Generally, carbon bikes are the better choice if you’re looking for a bike that is lighter, more comfortable, more responsive, and more efficient. Aluminum bikes are better if you’re looking for a bike that is cheaper, more durable, and safer.
Pros of Carbon Frames
- Lighter weight because the material is stronger and less dense
- Stiffer and more responsive. This improves handling
- More comfortable/better ride quality
- Carbon frames can last longer because they don’t fatigue
- Carbon fiber frames can be repaired if they crack
- More efficient because they are lighter, more aerodynamic, and more rigid
- No corrosion
- Higher-end and more technologically advanced
Cons of Carbon Frames
- More expensive
- Durability can be an issue. Carbon frames can crack from a light impact in some cases. You can also accidentally crack a frame by overtightening components
- Harder to carry luggage because you can’t mount racks and panniers to most carbon frames
- Bad for the environment because carbon fiber is not very recyclable
- Safety can be an issue because carbon frames can fail without warning if they are compromised
Pros of Aluminum Frames
- Cheaper
- More durable. Aluminum can withstand a harder impact without cracking or failing because it is less brittle
- More environmentally friendly. Aluminum is highly recyclable
- You can mount luggage and use your frame for touring
- Safer because aluminum is less likely to fail unexpectedly
Cons of Aluminum Frames
- Harsher ride because the frame is more rigid
- Heavier
- Aluminum frames often can’t be repaired if they crack
- Aluminum frames don’t last as long because the metal fatigues over time
Bike frames are most commonly made of carbon fiber, aluminum, steel, or titanium. The majority of modern mountain bike, gravel bike, and road bike frames are made of either carbon fiber or aluminum. High-end bikes and custom-made bikes are usually made of steel or titanium.
Carbon Fiber Bike Frames
Carbon fiber is basically a plastic that is reinforced with super strong fibers. The material was originally developed for use in the aerospace industry where parts need to be as light and strong as possible. It offers an incredibly high strength-to-weight ratio. It has a higher tensile strength than steel. In addition, it is also extremely rigid.
Carbon fiber is made by processing a polymer into strings or filaments of carbon atoms that measure 5-10 microns in diameter. Thousands of these filaments are combined to form a tow or ribbon. Tows are bonded together with an epoxy resin. The carbon and resin material is called a composite. Composites are layered into a laminate.
This material is then shaped into bike frames using molds and heat. Manufacturers use a number of different techniques. Some frames are made by bonding together individual carbon fiber tubes with a type of glued insert. Some high-end carbon bikes use modified monocoque construction. This means that the head tube, downtube, top tube, and seat tube consist of one continuous piece.
There is a lot of variation in the way that carbon frames are built as well as the way the carbon fiber itself is made. For example, the type of resin used, the thickness of the layers, the construction style, the way the material is heated, the direction of the fibers, the grade of carbon fiber, and the density and types of fibers used all play a role in the ride characteristics, durability, stiffness, and comfort of the finished frame.
Aluminum Bike Frames
Before carbon fiber became affordable and accessible to cyclists, aluminum was the most common frame material. The material is lightweight, stiff, affordable, and easy to work with.
Aluminum itself isn’t strong enough for building bike frames. It must be alloyed with other metallic elements, like magnesium, zinc, or silicon, to increase the strength and durability. 6061 and 7005 are the two most common aluminum alloys used for frame building. Of the two, 6061 is slightly superior due to its lower weight.
To reduce the weight, aluminum bike frames are generally butted. Butting involves removing unnecessary material from the inside of the frame tubes. In other words, making the tubes thinner where they don’t need as much strength. Butting makes the bike 3-4 pounds lighter, more compliant, and more responsive. The drawback is that the process adds cost.
After the tubes are shaped and butted, they are welded together with TIG welds. Finally, the frames are heat-treated for strength.
These days, manufacturers can also manipulate aluminum with a process called hydroforming. Hydroforming involves placing the aluminum tubes in a mold then injecting the mold with fluid at incredibly high pressures. These tubes form to the mold.
Frames can also be hydroformed after they are welded to fine-tune the shape. Hydroforming can optimize the aluminum frame shape for aerodynamics, stiffness, and comfort. This process can be used to mold the frame into complex shapes that can’t be achieved by hand.
Carbon Fiber Vs Aluminum Bike Frames
Frame Weight
Carbon bike frames are lighter than equivalent aluminum frames. In fact, carbon fiber is the lightest bike frame material in use today. A lighter bike allows you to climb and accelerate faster and maneuver more easily because there is less weight to move around.
Many manufacturers offer complete 15 lb (6.8 kg) carbon road bikes. This is the minimum bike weight according to the UCI rules. Carbon frames themselves weigh as little as 700-1000 grams. 20 lb complete carbon mountain bikes are commonly available as well.
Complete aluminum road bikes, on the other hand, weigh around 18 pounds on average. That’s 3 pounds heavier. Top-of-the-line aluminum frames weigh about half a pound more than carbon frames. Aluminum mountain bikes weigh around 1 pound more than comparable carbon fiber mountain bikes.
Carbon fiber frames are lighter than their aluminum counterparts because the material is less dense. The density of modern carbon fiber is about 1.9 g/cm^3 compared to aluminum which has a density of about 2.3 g/cm^3. Carbon fiber has an incredibly high strength-to-weight ratio.
Of course, carbon fiber bikes aren’t always the lighter option. Different grades of carbon fiber exist. Lower-end carbon fiber frames use fillers and more resin. This lowers costs but increases the weight.
A Modern aluminum frame will be almost as light. In fact, a low-end carbon frame could weigh more than a high-end aluminum frame.
Because both frame materials are so light, the weight of the components also plays a major role. An ultralight carbon frame fitted with heavy, low-end components might end up weighing more and performing worse than an aluminum frame fitted with better components. In this scenario, both bikes might end up costing the same.
A carbon bike with carbon bars and carbon wheels will be far lighter than an aluminum bike with aluminum handlebars and wheels. It will also have a far higher price tag.
For most riders, the weight difference is pretty insignificant. In fact, most of us could stand to lose the extra 1-3 pound difference between the frame materials. This would provide better performance gains and cost thousands of dollars less than buying a lighter bike.
Winner: Carbon fiber
Comfort
Carbon frames offer a more comfortable ride than aluminum frames. The reason is that the material does a better job of absorbing shocks and dampening vibrations from the road.
Generally, you want your frame to be stiff laterally so you don’t waste energy flexing the frame from side to side as you push down on the pedals. Vertically, you want some flexibility for shock and vibration absorption. This makes the ride more comfortable while riding over bumps or rough roads.
Manufacturers can engineer carbon fiber frames in a way that makes them stiff in some places and somewhat flexible in other places. This is possible because carbon fiber can be fine tuned much more than aluminum. Manufacturers can varying the thickness of the carbon fiber, direction of the fibers, use different types of resin and filaments, and more.
For example, high-stress areas, like the bottom bracket, can be made incredibly stiff. Other areas, like the seat stays, can be made more compliant and flexible. This creates a comfortable frame without sacrificing efficiency or responsiveness. The lower density of carbon fiber also helps with vibration absorption. The improved ride quality is more noticeable on road frames than mountain bike frames.
Aluminum frames usually have a harsher and less refined ride than carbon frames. Because aluminum is a relatively soft metal, the frame tubes must be fairly thick to make the bike strong and durable. Aluminum frame tubing is thicker than carbon, steel, or titanium frame tubing. This results in an incredibly stiff frame.
Stiffer material makes for a harsh ride because the shocks and vibrations from the road transfer straight through the frame to your body. Rigid aluminum frames can’t offer as much dampening as more flexible carbon frames. For this reason, aluminum frames aren’t ideal for off-road riding or longer rides such as touring.
Having said this, there have been some major improvements in aluminum bike frame technology over the past 20 years that have greatly improved comfort. For example, the process of hydroforming allows frame builders to vary the wall thickness of aluminum tubes throughout their length.
This process allows manufacturers to form the frame thinner in areas where some flexibility is desired and thicker where strength is needed. The frame can be laterally stiff while still absorbing some vibration. Modern high-end aluminum frames are almost as comfortable as carbon frames.
Really, the frame material only plays a minor role in the overall comfort of the bike. Tires, suspension systems, saddles, grips, pedals, and the bike’s frame geometry have a much bigger influence over comfort. A properly fitting saddle and comfortable grips can make all the difference.
Wide, high-volume tires with low air pressure absorb most road noise. Suspension systems absorb the majority of shocks. The frame geometry is another important factor to consider. For example, a race bike with an aggressive riding position will be less comfortable than a hybrid bike with an upright seating position.
Winner: Carbon fiber
Ride Characteristics: Frame Stiffness, Handling, and Responsiveness
When building a bike frame, manufacturers have to strike a compromise. The bike needs to be stiff so it handles predictably and responsively. At the same time, the frame needs to have some give so the ride isn’t too harsh.
When you take a hard corner, you want your bike to maintain its line without flexing and derailing and sending you on an unpredictable path. You also don’t want the frame to flex excessively and waste energy. When you hit a bump in the road, you don’t want your teeth to shake out of your head because the ride is so harsh.
Carbon frames have superior ride characteristics, including handling, responsiveness, and comfort. Mostly because the material allows manufacturers to strike a better compromise between stiffness and compliance. Carbon fiber offers frame builders the ability engineer and fine-tune the frame with incredible precision so the finished bike has the exact desired ride characteristics.
For example, manufacturers can vary the number of layers of carbon fiber to make some sections thicker than others. They can also change the direction of the fibers. The raw carbon fiber material can be made with different densities of filaments or different types or amounts of resin. Other types of fibers can also be mixed with the carbon filaments to change the behavior of the material.
All of these options as well as computer modeling are available to engineers when designing and building carbon frames. They can change the stiffness and flexibility of a particular section to optimize the frame for handling, responsiveness, comfort, and all other aspects of ride quality.
Aluminum is a bit more limiting material to work with. The tubes can be butted and the thickness can be varied through hydroforming. Manufacturers can adjust the shape of the tubing as well. This allows for a good amount of control over the ride quality, stiffness, and responsiveness. Just not quite as much as carbon fiber.
Having said this, the difference isn’t all that great. Both materials can make stiff and responsive frames. Particularly with modern techniques. After riding for a few hours on either frame material, you would quickly grow accustomed to the bike feel and ride quality. For most riders, the difference in ride quality is marginal.
Winner: Carbon fiber
Durability
Because aluminum is a weaker material than carbon fiber, you would expect it to be less durable. In practice, this isn’t the case because aluminum is less brittle. Over the years, aluminum has proven to be an incredibly durable and reliable bike frame material.
Generally, an aluminum frame can handle a harder impact force than a carbon frame without cracking or breaking. The frame may suffer a cosmetic dent but still remain rideable. For this reason, many cyclists who ride in disciplines where crashing is common, like many forms of mountain biking, choose to ride aluminum frames. They can just take more of a beating.
This allows the rider to attempt more challenging trails without having to worry as much about destroying the frame. It’s also easier on the budget. If a frame gets cracked, it’s much cheaper to replace than an expensive carbon frame.
Having said this, if you crash hard enough, you can destroy an aluminum frame. If the aluminum cracks, the bike is unsafe to ride because the frame could fail catastrophically without warning. Dents in aluminum can also create weak spots which can compromise the frame. It can be hard to identify whether a dent is a cosmetic or structural issue. If you’re unsure, you’ll want to take the frame to a professional to have it inspected for safety.
Under normal riding conditions, carbon fiber frames are incredibly strong and durable. After all, carbon fiber is 5 times stronger than steel and has one of the highest strength-to-weight ratios of any material. Problems arise when carbon frames experience a sudden impact force that is concentrated to a small area of the frame.
Because the material is fairly brittle, the frame can crack or break surprisingly easily. A crash hard enough to dent a metal frame could cause a carbon frame to crack, rendering it unrideable. A comparable metal frame may still be rideable after suffering the same impact force.
Historically, carbon fiber hasn’t been the most reliable frame material either. There are plenty of stories out there of carbon frames failing prematurely or cracking during a minor crash. You’ll want to inspect the frame periodically and after an accident.
The most common failure points on carbon frames are the bonded junctions. These are areas where tubes that were made separately during manufacture were stuck together. To be safe, you’ll want to periodically inspect your rear dropouts where the seat and chainstays meet, the head tube where it meets the down tube and top tube, the bottom bracket area, and the area around the seat post clamp.
Areas with glued inserts can also be weak spots. Inspect the bottom bracket threads, headset race, and rear dropouts. You should also look at the bottom of the down tube and chainstays. Rocks get kicked up and can cause damage to the tubes, weakening them. You may want to apply some type of frame protection on these areas.
Cracks can be difficult to spot. It can be helpful to run a cloth along the frame tubes. Broken or lose fibers can catch on the cloth. If you suspect that an area is cracked, you can tap around on it with a coin. A dull sound means the area could be weakened. A crisp sound means the material is in good condition. If you’re unsure, check with a professional.
If you spot any cracks, you’ll need to get them repaired or retire the frame. It’s not safe to ride a cracked carbon frame because they can fail without warning.
Carbon fiber bikes these days are much better than they were in the past. Modern materials and manufacturing techniques have made the material much more durable. For example, modified monocoque construction has made tube junction failures incredibly uncommon. This is because the bike, including the headtube, downtube, seat tube, and top tube, is made as a single piece. This eliminates some of the most common bonded junction failure points.
A note about accidental damage: One major drawback to carbon fiber is that it’s pretty easy to accidentally crack it. If you over-tighten components when installing them, you risk cracking your frame. You can’t just crank down until a bolt or screw is tight like you can on a metal framed bike. To be safe, it’s best to use a torque wrench and tighten everything to the manufacturer’s specifications. You’ll have to spend a bit more time and take more care when working on your carbon bike.
Winner: Aluminum
Repairability: Can You Repair Carbon and Aluminum Bike Frames?
One of the biggest benefits of carbon fiber frames is that if you crack your frame in an accident or just notice a crack developing from heavy use, it can be repaired in most cases. In fact, carbon fiber frames are often easier to repair than metal frames.
The repair process involves removing the damaged section and recreating that section with new carbon fiber. If the damage is minor, a simple patch can be used.
Carbon frame repair is a job that’s best left to a professional frame builder who knows what they’re doing. DIY repair options are available as well but are only recommended for minor repairs. Check out this guide to repairing a carbon bike for more info. Bike manufacturers may try to tell you that it’s impossible to repair a broken carbon frame in hopes that you buy a new bike instead. When repaired correctly, the frame is as good as new.
Aluminum frames, on the other hand, can’t be repaired in most cases. The reason is that you can’t simply bend aluminum back into shape and re-weld it like you can with steel. When you weld aluminum, you must re-temper or heat-treat the whole frame to strengthen the metal. This involves heating then cooling the entire aluminum frame in a controlled manner. This process is more expensive than just buying a new frame. If you skip this step, the weld probably won’t hold.
Also, once a crack or dent has formed in the aluminum tubing, it is difficult to determine the structural integrity of the frame. Another spot could have weakened as well. It’s difficult to tell by looking at the frame. If your aluminum frame cracks, you should replace it.
Having said this, you could surely find someone who would be willing to TIG weld your broken aluminum frame to attempt a repair. You may get thousands more miles out of the frame or it may fail the next day. If you decide to do this, remember that you’re taking a chance. A catastrophic frame failure is a possibility.
Tip: Many major manufacturers guarantee their frames for a certain amount of time. If your frame cracks, you may be able to get it replaced for free. Be sure to check your warranty before going out and buying a new frame.
Winner: Carbon fiber
Cost
Aluminum is the cheapest bike frame material. It’s cheaper than steel, titanium, and carbon fiber. Aluminum frames often cost half as much as carbon frames.
The main reason is that aluminum frames can be mass-produced in a factory. Many of the manufacturing processes can be automated. It takes far fewer man-hours to make an aluminum frame and the raw material is cheaper. Fewer specialized tools are required as well.
The low price is the reason that alloy frames were introduced in the first place. They brought down the cost of bicycles considerably. To see how cheap aluminum frames can be, look at the bikes at a Walmart or any big box store. You’ll notice that they are almost all aluminum and incredibly cheap.
Due to the lower price, aluminum is a good choice for cycling events that are hard on frames or events where there is a high likelihood of crashing, like downhill or freeride mountain biking. If the frame gets damaged, it is much less expensive to replace. Amateur racers who buy their own bikes may also enjoy the cost savings.
Carbon frames are more expensive because building them is a labor-intensive process. It takes more man-hours and much of the work must be done by hand instead of a machine.
For example, carbon fiber layup must be done by hand. This increases labor costs. Carbon fiber is a difficult material to work with. It takes some skill. Building a carbon frame also requires specialized molds and equipment that add to the cost. The raw material is expensive as well. Carbon fiber material costs more than aluminum. All of this contributes to the high price of carbon frames.
To meet a lower price point, some manufacturers use a lower grade of carbon fiber that uses more epoxy and fillers. These frames are heavier and may not offer any benefits over aluminum. If you’re on a tight budget, you’re probably better off staying away from carbon frames or buying used.
You’ll also want to consider the components the bike comes with if you’re buying a complete bike. When comparing carbon and aluminum framed bikes that both cost the same, the aluminum bike will have higher-end components.
The components play a major role in the bike’s performance and ride quality. An aluminum bike may be the better buy at lower price ranges. You might be better off getting a slightly lower-end frame so you can afford higher-end components. There are trade-offs.
Winner: Aluminum
Frame Efficiency and Aerodynamics
Carbon frames are more efficient than aluminum frames. The increased efficiency allows you to travel further using the same amount of energy that you would on a comparable aluminum frame. You’ll probably maintain a higher average speed as well. This is probably the reason that the pros all use carbon frames these days.
Carbon frames are more efficient for three main reasons:
- Carbon frames are lighter- It takes less energy to accelerate, climb, and maintain speed with a lighter bike. You’re simply moving less mass around when you ride. When riding a heavier aluminum frame, you’ll tire out more quickly and ride slightly slower.
- Carbon frames are more rigid- When you pedal hard, bike frames want to flex from side to side. When this happens, energy is being used to flex the frame rather than push you forward. Flexing a frame laterally doesn’t accomplish anything. It’s just wasted energy. Carbon fiber frames are designed for torsional stiffness so they don’t twist as you pedal. This way, you use your energy more efficiently. The power transfer from the pedals to the rear wheel is efficient. Compared to their carbon counterparts, aluminum frames are slightly less stiff. When you pedal, the frame flexes torsionally. This wastes som energy flexing the frame that could be used to drive you forward.
- Carbon frames offer better aerodynamics- Carbon fiber can be molded into pretty much any shape. This allows manufacturers to mold the frame tubes into more aerodynamic designs that reduce wind resistance. This saves a considerable amount of energy when riding at speeds above 10 mph. Aluminum frames can’t be quite as aerodynamic. Because aluminum isn’t as strong as carbon fiber, the tubes need to be slightly thicker to make the bike strong enough. The extra thickness in the tubes creates air resistance that slows you down.
Of course, efficiency really only matters to professional cyclists. Recreational riders probably won’t notice a difference or won’t care. The difference is pretty minimal. Both carbon and aluminum can make incredibly lightweight, stiff, and aerodynamic frames.
Winner: Carbon fiber
Frame Longevity: How Long Will Carbon and Aluminum Frames Last?
In theory, carbon frames last longer because carbon fiber doesn’t fatigue like aluminum. As long as you take good care of your bike while transporting it and don’t crash too hard, a carbon frame can last a long time. Almost indefinitely.
Having said this, even though carbon fiber is an incredibly strong material, it is more brittle than aluminum. It can’t handle as hard of impacts without cracking. If you participate in a cycling discipline that is particularly demanding on frames, there is a good chance that your carbon frame will crack during an accident and fail prematurely.
Aluminum, on the other hand, fatigues over time. After enough miles, the material eventually cracks and fails. How long your aluminum frame lasts depends on the type of riding you do, how you treat it, and the quality of the aluminum and welds. If you’re hard on your aluminum frame, it may fail after 5 years. If you treat it properly, you could get decades of use out of it.
Winner: Aluminum
Safety
Carbon fiber frames may be more dangerous than aluminum frames. The reason is that it isn’t immediately obvious when a carbon fiber frame is structurally compromised. You could miss a hairline fracture during an inspection or the damage could be covered by the frame’s finish. Carbon fiber can fail catastrophically and without warning. Imagine bombing down a hill at 30 mph when your head tube separates from your down tube and top tube.
For a real-world example, check out this article about a carbon bike failures and lawsuits. Several people have been seriously injured when their bike shattered underneath them. While this is unlikely, it is possible. Carbon handlebars have also been known to fail unexpectedly.
Aluminum frames don’t fail in the same way. The material tends to give you some early warning signs that it is going to break. The frame may crack and bend slightly before completely failing. You may hear some creaking or notice some changes in the ride quality. It is also easier to spot cracks in aluminum than it is in carbon fiber.
To be safe, you should thoroughly check your bike frame for cracks at least once per season and after a crash. You should do a quick inspection after every wash and if you hear a creak or unfamiliar sound while riding. Be extra thorough around the common failure points outlined in the durability section above.
To inspect a carbon frame, begin by looking for scratches in the paint. If you spot any scratches that appear deeper than the paint, use a coin to tap around the scratch. Listen for a change in pitch as you tap around the area. If the carbon is broken underneath, the tap will sound dull. You can also gently press on any areas where you suspect that the frame is cracked. If they feel softer, the carbon is broken. For more info, check out this guide to inspecting a carbon frame.
To inspect an aluminum frame, look for any deep dents or cracks on the tubing. Also look closely at the welds to make sure there isn’t any cracking or crimping. Make sure the wheels are aligned. If you find any issues, the frame could be compromised.
Winner: Aluminum
Which Frame Material is More Environmentally Friendly?
Most cyclists care greatly about the environment. For some of us, it’s the reason we ride a bike instead of drive or take the bus. One great feature of aluminum is that is incredibly recyclable. In fact, it is one of the most recyclable materials out there. For this reason, aluminum frames are much more environmentally friendly than carbon fiber frames.
For example, according to this article from Aluminum.org, almost 75% of the aluminum produced in the US is still in use. Aluminum can be recycled indefinitely. After you’ve gotten years of enjoyment out of your aluminum frame, it can be melted down and recycled into an endless number of products including soda cans, building materials, or a new bike frame.
Unfortunately, carbon fiber is not an environmentally friendly material. The truth is that most of it ends up in landfills. The reason is that carbon fiber is not really recyclable. It can’t be simply melted down and reused like metals.
The recycling process that exists today involves burning away the polymers so the carbon filaments can be reused. This is basically burning plastic. As you can imagine, this isn’t a very green process. Larger pieces are sometimes re purposed into other products.
Winner: Aluminum
Corrosion and Degradation
Corrosion isn’t really a concern with either carbon or aluminum frames. This means you don’t have to worry about your frame getting wet or exposed to salty sea air, chemicals, or road salt and rusting. Carbon fiber, not being a metal, doesn’t rust or oxidize at all.
Aluminum alloy contains very little if any iron so it doesn’t rust either. Having said that, aluminum does corrode. Interestingly, corrosion is somewhat beneficial for the material. When aluminum alloy gets exposed to moisture, a hard film of aluminum oxide forms on the surface. This material is quite strong. Much stronger than rust. It also protects the underlying aluminum from further corrosion. This means that an aluminum frame won’t corrode away over time.
Of course, even if the frame can’t corrode, that doesn’t mean that other components can’t as well. You’ll want to keep an eye on your chain, spokes, rims, handlebars, crankset, derailleurs, and any components that contain steel parts. Most bikes also use steel bolts that can corrode over time. If you ride near the ocean, it’s a good idea to keep an eye out for rust. The only bicycle frame material that rusts is steel.
One issue with older or lower-end carbon fiber frames is that UV light could cause them to degrade over time. The carbon fibers themselves do not degrade but the resin used to hold them together could in some cases. This can cause the frame to become brittle and eventually break. This problem has mostly been solved on newer and higher-end carbon fiber frames. If you’re buying a brand new bike, this isn’t even worth worrying about.
Winner: Carbon fiber
Carrying Luggage
If you plan to do any bicycle touring or bikepacking, you’ll want to choose an aluminum frame over carbon. The reason is that aluminum is a strong enough material to support racks and panniers without damaging the frame. In fact, many companies make dedicated touring or bikepacking bikes with aluminum frames.
If you plan to tour on your bike, make sure that it has the proper braze-ons or eyelets for mounting racks. For more info, check out my guide to choosing a touring bike.
Carbon fiber frames, on the other hand, aren’t really suitable for carrying luggage. Most carbon frames can’t accept racks and panniers because they put too much stress on the frame tubes. They can crack or break. For this reason, carbon frames are not recommended for bicycle touring or bikepacking.
Having said this, there are a few options for carrying luggage on a carbon framed bike. The best option is to use a trailer. These attach to the rear axle or seat post and put very little stress on the bike’s frame. For more info, check out my guide to the different types of bike trailers or check out my trailer vs pannier pros and cons list.
You can usually use bikepacking bags safely on a carbon frame as well as long as you don’t overload them. Bikepacking bags attach directly to the frame with straps and buckles. No bolts are required. You’ll still want to be careful about not overloading the bike.
Winner: Aluminum
Bike Frame Technology, Frame Design, and Optimization
Carbon fiber is a high tech material that gives framebuilders nearly unlimited options for fine tuning and optimizing the frame to their exact desired specifications.
For example, engineers can change the thickness of the carbon fiber with extreme accuracy by varying the number of layers. They can vary the direction of the carbon fiber. Different types of resin can be used in the manufacture of the carbon to change the characteristics of the material. They can vary the density of the carbon filaments or add different fillers to change its characteristics. There are an incredible number of variables that can be adjusted to optimize the bike for performance and comfort.
For this reason, carbon fiber bikes are considered to be higher end. Pretty much every bike being raced professionally in both road and mountain biking is made of carbon fiber. Almost every high-end bike is carbon these days. That says something about the material. For some riders, carbon frames are also a bit of a status symbol because they are so expensive. If you like to use the best, most advanced gear that the cycling industry has to offer, you can’t go wrong with a carbon frame.
Even though aluminum is an easier material to work with than carbon fiber, it can’t be manipulated and fine tuned quite as much. Aluminum can be butted and hydroformed to change the shape and thickness of the tubes. Different aluminum alloys are also available with different characteristics. Some are stiffer than others.
These options gives frame builders some control over the ride characteristics of the finished aluminum frame but they do need to make some compromises. You might have to sacrifice some comfort or efficiency.
Aluminum is often associated with lower-end bikes. After all, it’s the cheapest bike frame material. Some riders consider their bike to be a bit of a status symbol. They want to ride the best and most modern equipment Carbon and titanium bikes are considered higher-end.
Winner: Carbon fiber
My Experience
I’ve ridden both carbon fiber and aluminum frames extensively over the years. When I ride my bikes, I’m usually either touring or riding recreationally. I enjoy riding trails near my home. For the type of riding I do, aluminum is the better choice.
The main reason is the durability. With an aluminum frame, I don’t have to worry as much about causing damage during a minor accident. When I ride my carbon bike, I’m always paranoid that I will crack the frame, even though I know that modern carbon frames are very durable. I don’t have this fear when I ride my aluminum bike. Aluminum can take a lot more abuse. I’ve never broken an aluminum frame.
I also do quite a bit of touring. Carbon fiber isn’t really an option for touring bikes because you can’t mount luggage on most carbon frames. Aluminum is a great material for touring bikes. It’s lightweight and can handle the extra weight of racks and panniers.
The cost is also a major factor for me. I have a limited budget to work with, unfortunately. Aluminum frames are far cheaper than carbon.
Other Bike Frame Materials
Even though aluminum and carbon fiber are the two most popular options in use today, you still have two different materials to consider. For some types of cycling, steel or titanium are better choices.
Steel Bike Frames
Steel is the original bike frame material. As the saying goes ‘steel is real’ In fact, it was the only modern frame option up until the mid-1970s when the first aluminum bikes became widely available. In recent years, steel frames have declined in popularity. Mostly due to their heavy weight.
Steel is an alloy of iron. It is usually mixed with carbon and traces of other elements to increase strength and reduce weight. Like aluminum, steel can also be butted to save weight, just like aluminum. There are two types of steel used for bike framebuilding.
Chromoly steel is the strongest, lightest, and most common. Chromoly is a steel alloy made by combining steel with chromium and molybdenum. Adding these elements increases the strength-to-weight ratio of the steel. Several different versions of chromoly exist. The most popular is 4130. Hi-tensile steel is a heavier and cheaper type of steel that is used to build lower-end bike frames.
To join the tubes, manufacturers either weld, braze, or use lugs. Welding bonds the frame tubes by melting them together with a filler material. Generally, TIG welding is used on bike frames. Brazing sticks the frame tubes with a molten filler material. The frame tubes themselves do not melt. Lugs are sleeves that fit around the frame tube. The frame is brazed to the lugs to hold the bike together.
The main advantage that steel bikes offer over any other material is the smoother ride. Steel has some flex. It’s not completely rigid. This greatly dampens vibrations and makes for a springy and comfortable ride. For this reason, steel is a popular choice for touring bikes and gravel bikes. Steel is also easy to repair if it cracks. Pretty much any welder can fix a broken steel frame.
The main drawback to steel is the weight. Steel is the heaviest bike frame material in use. This makes the bike slower and less efficient than carbon or aluminum. Steel can also rust if it’s not properly taken care of.
Check out my steel vs aluminum bike frames guide for more info.
Titanium Bike Frames
Titanium is a favorite of custom frame builders. This high-end material is stronger and significantly lighter than steel. In fact, it has the highest strength-to-weight ratio of any metal. It is also resistant to corrosion and fatigue.
Titanium frames really offer the best of all worlds. This is probably the reason the material is so commonly used in the aerospace and defense industries where strength, weight, and reliability are all prioritized.
The physical properties of titanium make it an incredibly long-lasting material. A well-built titanium frame should last a lifetime. In fact, many manufacturers even offer a lifetime guarantee against defects.
Titanium is also known for its smooth ride quality. Many riders find it more comfortable than steel or carbon fiber. For this reason, titanium is an excellent choice for mountain, touring, or road bikes.
The only real drawback to titanium bike frames is the cost. They are incredibly expensive. The material itself is expensive. There is also quite a bit of labor involved. Titanium is a fairly difficult material to work with.
A number of different titanium alloys exist. Some are harder to work with than others. For building bike frames, titanium is often alloyed together with aluminum and traces of other elements.
Titanium frame tubes are welded together, just like steel or aluminum. The process is made slightly more complicated because titanium reacts with oxygen. Titanium bike frames can also be lugged.
For more info, check out my guides to titanium vs carbon fiber bike frames and titanium vs steel bike frames.
One other less common bike frame material to consider is bamboo. For more info, check out my guide to bamboo bikes.
Final Thoughts
When choosing between a carbon fiber or aluminum bike frame, the main differences come down to weight, durability, comfort, and price. There are trade-offs between these four. There really isn’t a best material.
When you choose a carbon frame, you’re prioritizing weight and comfort over durability and price. When you buy an aluminum frame, you’re prioritizing durability and price. You’ll have to compromise somewhere. Of course, your personal preference also comes into play.
Consider how often you crash, whether you’re an elite rider or more casual, how much weight matters, and your budget.
If you’re still undecided, head to your local bike shop and give both frame materials a try to see which you like. You may find that you really like the light weight of a carbon frame. Maybe you find that you prefer the extra cost of carbon isn’t worth it.
Whichever frame material you end up going with, hopefully this guide helps you choose the best bike for your riding style.
Where do you stand on the carbon vs aluminum bike frame debate? Share your experience in the comments below!
Pin it for later!
More from Where The Road Forks
- Flat Pedals Vs Clipless: Pros and Cons
- Types of Bicycle Handlebars
- 1X Vs 2X Drivetrain
- Fat Bike Vs Mountain Bike: Pros and Cons
Zachary Friedman is an accomplished travel writer and professional blogger. Since 2011, he has traveled to 66 countries and 6 continents. He founded ‘Where The Road Forks’ in 2017 to provide readers with information and insights based on his travel and outdoor recreation experience and expertise. Zachary is also an avid cyclist and hiker. Living as a digital nomad, Zachary balances his professional life with his passions for hiking, camping, cycling, and worldwide exploration. For a deeper dive into his journey and background, visit the About page. For inquiries and collaborations, please reach out through the Contact page. You can also follow him on Facebook.
Will
Tuesday 9th of August 2022
Great article, thank you! Have been reading a lot of forums and have not found any answer one way or another. This article summarizes things very nicely, and probably just saved me from spending a $1k trading my aluminum frame for a carbon one. Thanks!
wheretheroadforks
Tuesday 9th of August 2022
Thanks for reading!
Kevin
Wednesday 29th of June 2022
CAAD12, aluminium alloy bike with carbon fork and carbon wheels here. Decent article but seems in favour or carbon bikes. If you are a pro cyclist then by all means ride carbon. For average riders a good aluminium bike is a far better choice as carbon will easily crack and you won’t know it until it’s too late. The bike just falls apart. Everyday things happen and aluminium will handle much better. 4000 plus miles on my CAAD12 and will last me for years. Getting carbon wheels was the best upgrade highly recommend getting them.
wheretheroadforks
Monday 4th of July 2022
I agree about the durability. Carbon frames are pretty easy to damage. I think an aluminum frame with a carbon fork and carbon wheels is a great compromise.
michael
Saturday 7th of August 2021
good article-I lurned a few things- but what about an aluminum fram and a carbon fork and carbon seat stay-bike those kind are pretty common as well and light-usually less than 22# I found a carbon China-bike for less than $1500-from Savadeck bikes it weighs a little over 20#-have you seen it
wheretheroadforks
Wednesday 11th of August 2021
I haven't seen that particular bike but I think an aluminum frame with a carbon fork is a good compromise. It's a great way to save some weight and money.
Graham Terry
Thursday 8th of July 2021
I am 71 and have been riding for 30 years never spent a lot of money on a bike I still try and ride at a good pace never had carbon I am on the fence to buy aluminium again or go carbon. Great article.
wheretheroadforks
Wednesday 14th of July 2021
I think if money isn't an issue, carbon bikes are nice. For me, they aren't worth the extra cost. I don't ride competitively so I don't really care about a bit of extra weight.
Robert
Wednesday 12th of May 2021
I'm not sold on the need (or true benefit) for a 15# carbon bike, like a Canyon Ultimate SLX compared to say an 18# alloy Cannondale CAAD13. I have a Cannondale Hybrid from 2008, which is basically the same frame as a CAAD of the same era, 23 lbs. as equipped with MTB type cockpit, triple crank, 8 speed freehub and 700x37c tires with tubes. I had signed up for the 2021 Assault on Mt Mitchell, 102 miles with 11,000 ft of climbing so I was considering a lighter bike to help out on the climbing physics, so I test rode a used Trek Domane 4.5 OCLV ( I think, it was carbon with the iso-de-coupler thingy), which was in the 18-20 lbs range. I couldn't really tell if it was that much smoother riding and up on the hoods, probably no faster than the Cannondale hybrid which cost one fourth as much as the carbon bike. The interesting thing was that in comparing the carbon Trek to my old 26 lbs 1984 Schwinn Le Tour Luxe made of 4130 steel (the first bike I bought after college 37 years ago), it was no faster on two Strava road segments that I regularly ride. Ultimately, I decided to stick with my old bikes, and then Covid killed the Assault, so I avoided spending $1400 on a used bike that probably wouldn't have made that much difference in performance. The old Schwinn rides smooth and, with it, I have made the top ten on short segments near my house where the competition is all guys half my age on modern road bikes. I even have a KOM on one lightly traveled segment where I rode both my Schwinn and Cannondale back-to-back and amazingly got the exact same time on both rides that day.
wheretheroadforks
Thursday 3rd of June 2021
That's interesting that you got the same time. I would have thought there would at least be a few seconds difference with such a big weight difference.